Deregulation: A Ten-for-One Rule
Another major initiative has been the administration’s approach to federal regulations. In January 2025, a deregulation order was introduced requiring federal agencies to repeal ten existing rules for every new rule introduced.
This policy aims to reduce the size and complexity of government oversight, with supporters arguing that fewer regulations can boost business growth and make it easier for companies to operate. Critics, however, worry that rapid deregulation could weaken important protections in areas such as consumer safety or the environment.
For older adults who remember past decades of economic reform, this move may bring back memories of earlier deregulation waves in industries like airlines, energy, and telecommunications. Each shift brought both opportunities and challenges, showing how government policy can ripple through everyday life.
Climate and Environmental Policies
One of the most symbolic decisions made was the withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, a global accord aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This move represents a broader shift toward emphasizing national independence over international environmental commitments.
At the same time, restrictions on single-use plastics were lifted, allowing for wider production and distribution of plastic products. Supporters argue this decision helps reduce costs for manufacturers and consumers, while environmental advocates caution about long-term effects on sustainability.
For seniors, these changes may feel especially significant. Many have witnessed decades of debate over environmental policies, from the first Earth Day in 1970 to today’s discussions about climate change. Each generation has faced the question of how to balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.
Questions About Citizenship Policies
Another executive action involved changes to birthright citizenship rules, which has raised a number of legal and constitutional debates. At the moment, this decision is facing scrutiny in courts, with experts divided on how such a policy might be implemented and whether it aligns with longstanding U.S. legal traditions.
For those who value America’s history of immigration and constitutional protections, this will be an area to watch closely in the months ahead.
Next
